Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!thyme!kaleb From: kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov (Kaleb Keithley) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Does ESIX still not support RLL? Message-ID: <1991Apr23.152737.3046@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov> Date: 23 Apr 91 15:27:37 GMT References: <1991Apr21.155642.1586@shambala.uucp> <1991Apr22.210543.27730@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov> <512@pyrite.nj.pyramid.com> Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA Lines: 24 In article bill@pyrite.UUCP (Bill Pechter) writes: >In article I wrote: >>In article kentkar@shambala.uucp (Kent Karrer) writes: >>>It is nice to see a unix vendor offering an upgrade to R4.0 at a reasonable >>>cost. But does ESIX still not support RLL disk controllers? >> >>The myth that ESIX doesn't support RLL controllers is a bit of marketing >>hype. ESIX documentation states unequivocally that ESIX does support >>RLL, and I can unequivocally state that both 5.3.2.C and 5.3.2.D both >>support RLL very nicely. > >But when I call them and ask if it'll run with my Perstor controller they >refuse to say it will. I can't see laying out the money for a copy of >Unix that may not work on my machine. If they could tell me that it works >the check would be in the mail today. I didn't say anything about ARLL, which is what the Perstore is. ESIX Rev C didn't work with the Perstore. I haven't tried Rev D yet. -- Kaleb Keithley kaleb@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov Meep Meep Roadrunner Veep veep Quayle