Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uupsi!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Subject: Re: Summary: What's wrong with SCO (long) Message-ID: Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC References: <1991Apr14.022153.2099@emisle.uucp> <1991Apr16.183342.10185@compu.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 91 22:31:28 GMT In article <1991Apr16.183342.10185@compu.com> fred@compu.com (Fred Rump) writes: > dvb@emisle.uucp (David Van Beveren) writes: > >The one-line summary is this: People who have SCO Unix are satisfied with it. > Reading the various responses I get a different message back. > It seems that satisfied is a bit of an understatement. Reading the responses, I get a different message back. It seems that SCO is as buggy as all hell, but if you never do anything but run canned stuff you never excersize the bugs. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' peter@ferranti.com +1 713 274 5180. 'U` "Have you hugged your wolf today?"