Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!aragorn From: aragorn@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Steve J White) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: Comm trouble: Win + DOV unit Message-ID: <11332@uwm.edu> Date: 23 Apr 91 18:02:00 GMT References: <1991Apr21.102731.19232@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <6553@bwdls58.bnr.ca> Sender: news@uwm.edu Organization: University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee Lines: 32 In article <6553@bwdls58.bnr.ca> mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Mark Lord) writes: >In article <1991Apr21.102731.19232@en.ecn.purdue.edu> stevew@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Steven L Wootton) writes: >... >< > >Hmm.. almost as if there were a steady flow of interrupts (or a stuck interrupt) >in/under windows... > >Is the baud rate set up correctly in windows? (just fishin'). I see two possibilities here. First, and most unlikely, is the trouble Win3 has with sharing IRQ lines. I can give the details of this if you like. Second, and MORE likely, is that the port card you are using is somehow tying up the COM port that you want to use for the DOV unit. It could be that, if this is a cheaper clone port card, it is pulling some aspect f the COM port down. I have had the experience with some of the lesser known brands of port cards that when they are set up for only one COM port, they still have the (dis)ability to tie up the other COM port. I've never quite figured this one out. Let us know what happens. - steve -- "Laugh and the world laughs with you... | All disclaimers apply... snore and you sleep alone." | except my own, of course. - anonymous fortune cookie thingy | *** Steve J. White *** <<< aragorn@csd4.csd.uwm.edu >>>