Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:11843 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:8951 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!apple!sun-barr!newstop!exodus!celebrity!nataraj From: nataraj@celebrity.Eng.Sun.COM (Nataraj) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! READ THIS, you'll be impressed Message-ID: <12097@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> Date: 23 Apr 91 20:47:04 GMT References: <1991Apr22.135439.17136@rti.rti.org> <1991Apr23.002101.14336@amd.com> <1991Apr23.025053.956@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> Sender: news@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM Reply-To: nataraj@celebrity.Eng.1.com Followup-To: comp.windows.ms Organization: Sun MicroSystems Lines: 16 In article <1991Apr23.025053.956@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>, draper@buster.cps.msu.edu (Patrick J Draper) writes: |> In article <1991Apr23.002101.14336@amd.com> phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes: |> >bcw@rti.rti.org (Bruce Wright) writes: |> >>the marketplace). The high end is already owned by things like NeXT, |> >>and Unix with Xwindows and Motif. OS/2 V2.0 won't run on anything |> > |> >Get real. Who do you think will have shrink wrapped software first, |> >OS/2, which MS is pushing, or Unix, which (somebody?) is pushing. |> > What is OS/2 2.0 and what is OS/2 NT which MS is supposedly developing. Is it like the Unix split (SysV and BSD )?? nataraj/.