Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!samsung!crackers!m2c!risky.ecs.umass.edu!umaecs!daly From: daly@ecs.umass.edu (Bryon Daly, ECE dept, UMass, Amherst) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0 is here! READ THIS, you'll be impressed Message-ID: <13367.2814aeb7@ecs.umass.edu> Date: 23 Apr 91 22:01:27 GMT References: <1991Apr22.135439.17136@rti.rti.org> <1991Apr23.002101.14336@amd.com> <1991Apr23.025053.956@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> <12097@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> Followup-To: comp.windows.ms Lines: 26 In article <12097@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM>, nataraj@celebrity.Eng.Sun.COM (Nataraj) writes: > > What is OS/2 2.0 and what is OS/2 NT which MS is supposedly developing. > Is it like the Unix split (SysV and BSD )?? > > nataraj/. OS/2 was originally planned (and still might be?) as the successor of DOS, and was to deliver capabilites similar to more powerful OS's like UNIX (things like preemptive multitasking, which DOS/Windows does not deliver), along with a GUI environment. Early versions of OS/2 failed to deliver all they promised, and never took a strong market position. OS/2 v2.0 claims to rectify many earlier problems and deliver what was promised several years back (finally). Most people are saying "We'll see". From what I've heard the NT in OS/2 NT stands for New Technology and is MS's plan for the future of OS/2 / DOS. It is supposed to be high end stuff, with miraculous unheard of new features. OS/2 2.0 is just a step along the way towards NT. I wouldn't start lining up in software stores for it quite yet, though (to understate the fact). -Bryon daly@ecs.umass.edu