Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!ptimtc!rdmei!icspub!astemgw!kuis!rins!will
From: will@rins.ryukoku.ac.jp (will)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: X is/isn't faulty (was Ware Ware Wizardjin)
Message-ID: <241@rins.ryukoku.ac.jp>
Date: 19 Apr 91 06:54:12 GMT
References: <9104072151.AA28702@gaia> <128236@uunet.UU.NET> <1991Apr14.084432.11937@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>
Organization: Ryukoku Univ., Seta, Japan
Lines: 21

In article <1991Apr14.084432.11937@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>, mouse@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu (der Mouse) writes:
In article <128236@uunet.UU.NET>, rbj@uunet.UU.NET (Root Boy Jim) writes:
[...X...]
>>> was painfully slow, quite a pain to program, and binaries linked to
>> That's part of it. But the real problem is that it's too difficult to
>> program.  You can't possibly remember all those include files,
>> arguments, and function calls.  You'll need a whole shelf of manuals
>> to write the simplest code.
>
>Speak for yourself.  I need only one manual, and I keep it in a file
>(it's only about .75 MB).  And I don't refer to it all that often
>anyway.
>

	Sorry about being late on this one.  Better late than never.  But I
agree with the Mouse, I have 3 books here for reference and thats it.  I use
to have the complete set of the O'Reilly Books and others, but found them to
be usless.  The X Window APP Prog books and 1 in Japanese which is better than
them and thats it.  And I prog. in X every day.

							Will......