Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!emory!ox.com!yale!bunker!wtm From: cmfaltz@phoenix.princeton.edu (Christine Marie Faltz) Newsgroups: misc.handicap Subject: Re: Agreeing to disagree! Message-ID: <15047@handicap.news> Date: 19 Apr 91 20:16:02 GMT References: <18537@bunker.isc-br.com> Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com Reply-To: cmfaltz@phoenix.princeton.edu (Christine Marie Faltz) Organization: Princeton University Lines: 52 Approved: wtm@hnews.fidonet.org Fidonet: Blink Talk Conference Index Number: 15047 Jeff, give me a break, please. First of all, most exit doors only require that you "PUSH,"--it says so on the door; I've asked fellow passengers. One need only have the strength to do this; most of the doors are rather heavy. In the instance that pushing is not the correct way to open a door, I have a few comments: First, one can ask for instructions before the flight; second, there are many clueless sighted people who would not be able to follow the instructions written on the door in a panicked situation; third, even if they could understand the instructions, it does not mean that they would have the strength to open the door. The average, healthy blind person CAN OPEN an exit row door; I have done it. There are many sighted folks who sit in the exit row who are clueless, intoxicated, (alcohol is served to exit row passengers) easily panicked, or emotionally disturbed, (psychological batteries are not administered to sighted passengers sitting in the exit row) or physically unfit to open the door. There are two documented cases of blind men aiding in an evacuation. I have other comments on the airport controversies. Airport security and searches. I agree that canes should be checked--it is conceivable that some moron terrorist will pretend to be blind and carry a cane with a weapon inside. However, I have been victimized by airport security personnel who hid behind the "security" line. My dog guide's harness always makes the metal detector sound. I always offer to walk through alone, without my dog, and get her on the other side. Usually, I am allowed to do this, no big deal. Twice, however, I was stopped, after being assured that the people knew theharness did this. In one case, the woman searching people was new, and did not know how to use the hand-scanner. She proceeded to handle me--between my legs,my breasts, etc. "Excuse me, but if you're not yet competent to do your job, I should not be subjected to your desire for cheap thrills," I exclaimed, shoving her hands off me. "I realize the need for hand-scanning--with the scanner--but this 'search' you're doing right now is degrading and unnecessary." She said fine, she would take me to the ladies' room and strip search me, there! (This incident, almost to the letter, happened to another friend of mine.) I toldher that if she needed it so bad that she should go out and look for it on her own time, but that I wasn't interested. She screamed somethng about "these blind upstarts" after me as I went to my gate. Secuirity? Sometimes. Maybe most of the time. But there are many people, both on and off the planes, who degrade, humiliate and otherwise single out the blind at the airport--as well as everywhere else. Personnel should know how to use the hand-scanners, and I, as a young, healthy, strong, generally calm person, should be allowed to sit in the exit row. My blindness DOES NOT preventme from opening one of those doors. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Poor is the person | Christine Faltz | | whose permission | 33 Prospect Ave. | | depends upon the | Princeton, NJ 08540 | | perceptions of others. | "Who is John Galt?" | -------------------------------------------------------------------------