Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!amdcad!military
From: phil@brahms.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: How effective was the Stealth fighter?
Message-ID: <1991Apr19.070715.13542@amd.com>
Date: 18 Apr 91 22:05:47 GMT
References: <1991Apr18.032647.22171@amd.com>
Sender: military@amd.com
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc; Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 17
Approved: military@amd.com


From: phil@brahms.AMD.COM (Phil Ngai)


eachus@aries.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) writes:
>Some were allocated to F117As, some to Tomahawks, and the rest is history.

My impression from launching Tomahawks at Russian ships in
the IBM-PC game Harpoon is that they are relatively easy
to shoot down. An Iowa class battleship carries about 32
of them and that's not enough to take care of more than
one or two Russian ships, at least in the game.

Anyone know how many Tomahawks got through in the Gulf War?

--
The best way to preserve your RKBA is to vote Libertarian.