Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!aplcen!wb3ffv!ka3ovk!infopro!hoptoad!wet!roger From: roger@wet.UUCP (Roger Niclas) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Bitfax S/R ver 3.0 (was: Re: ZOFAX 96/24) Message-ID: <2354@wet.UUCP> Date: 26 Apr 91 20:16:06 GMT References: <7282@oasys.dt.navy.mil> Organization: Wetware Diversions, San Francisco Lines: 23 gallo@dtrc.dt.navy.mil (Gallo) writes: > > The Bitfax 3.0 revision is DV aware. Is anyone else having trouble getting Bitfax to format correctly? I can't seem to get it to produce a single page fax from even a 25-line ASCII file, unless I use the Letter Gothic (rather than the Bitstream Courier) typeface. It also seems not to be able to handle a WP5.1 document particularly well, despite its claims to the contrary. It screws up columns, is unable to deal with underlines or boldface, etc. Anyone know ways around these difficulties, or know of fax software that can *truly* handle WP 5.1? -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Email: roger@wet.UUCP | * * alt: rogerd@well | witty remark designed to exhibit intellect goes * * CompuServe: 72730,1010 | here *