Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!ariel.unm.edu!triton.unm.edu!prentice From: prentice@triton.unm.edu (John Prentice) Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Fortran 90 status Message-ID: <1991Apr25.043355.26420@ariel.unm.edu> Date: 25 Apr 91 04:33:55 GMT References: <1991Apr24.202115.16119@dragon.wpd.sgi.com> Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM Lines: 18 In article khb@chiba.Eng.Sun.COM (Keith Bierman fpgroup) writes: > > *) I believe that the vote was 26-9 to accept the document as it > stood after the edits. Two copies of the marked up document were > carried to Walt Brainerd (by two different X3J3 members, to > protect against lossage due to a plane crash). Voting against > were the reps from: Microsoft, Convex, Cray, Lahey, Harris, DoD, > Boeing, Unisys and DEC. > Gee, good to know only the minor players voted against it. So who voted for it? John -- John K. Prentice john@unmfys.unm.edu (Internet) Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA Computational Physics Group, Amparo Corporation, Albuquerque, NM, USA