Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!male!jethro!exodus!exodus-bb!khb From: khb@chiba.Eng.Sun.COM (Keith Bierman fpgroup) Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Fortran 90 status Message-ID: Date: 25 Apr 91 06:45:12 GMT References: <1991Apr24.202115.16119@dragon.wpd.sgi.com> <1991Apr25.043355.26420@ariel.unm.edu> Sender: news@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM Organization: Sun MegaSystems Lines: 15 In-reply-to: prentice@triton.unm.edu's message of 25 Apr 91 04:33:55 GMT In article <1991Apr25.043355.26420@ariel.unm.edu> prentice@triton.unm.edu (John Prentice) writes: Gee, good to know only the minor players voted against it. So who voted for it? Everyone else. The formal postmeeting distribution hasn't reached me yet, so I'd likely misrepresent someone if I relied on inference. However, in the last go round several "minor" players such as IBM, Amdahl, Sun, DECUS, and misc. national labs (and several foregin ones) voted Aye. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Keith H. Bierman keith.bierman@Sun.COM| khb@chiba.Eng.Sun.COM SMI 2550 Garcia 12-33 | (415 336 2648) Mountain View, CA 94043