Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!simpact!jeh
From: jeh@dcs.simpact.com
Newsgroups: comp.org.decus
Subject: Re: DECUS election ethics - LDEC
Message-ID: <1991Apr26.132534.2303@dcs.simpact.com>
Date: 26 Apr 91 20:25:34 GMT
References: <00947A86B48FB3E0.00002CBC@eisner.decus.org>
Organization: Simpact Associates, San Diego CA
Lines: 15

In article <00947A86B48FB3E0.00002CBC@eisner.decus.org>,
 hassinger@topaz.decus.org (Bob Hassinger) writes:
> I think those who are receiving ballots in the current DECUS by-law change
> election should be aware of the following discussion on DECUServe which has
> surfaced.  LDEC, the DECUS "election commission", has included an endorsement
> of the PRO view in their cover letter.  I appears this is inappropriate and
> tends to improperly influence the voters.  

Posting of opinions on this issue to comp.os.vms (a mistake not made by Bob,
but others have done so) is inappropriate too.  

	--- Jamie Hanrahan (x1116), Simpact Associates, San Diego CA
Chair, VMS Internals Working Group, U.S. DECUS VAX Systems SIG 
Internet:  jeh@dcs.simpact.com, or if that fails, jeh@crash.cts.com
Uucp:  ...{crash,scubed,decwrl}!simpact!jeh