Xref: utzoo comp.os.coherent:192 comp.os.minix:16025 comp.os.xinu:334
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!haven.umd.edu!umd5!cogsci!wjb
From: wjb@cogsci.cog.jhu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.os.coherent,comp.os.minix,comp.os.xinu
Subject: Re: Is posting srcs/bins OK here? (really an apology)
Keywords: V7 sources
Message-ID: <24.Apr.91.003055.53@cogsci.cog.jhu.edu>
Date: 24 Apr 91 04:30:55 GMT
References: <9104201711.45@rmkhome.UUCP> <1991Apr22.060838.28918@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <694@tivoli.UUCP>
Followup-To: /dev/null
Organization: JHU Cognitive Science Center, Baltimore, MD
Lines: 18

In article <694@tivoli.UUCP> lark@tivoli.com (Lar Kaufman) writes:
> [actually reposts something I said in comp.os.coherent]
>
>  ...  I think that having separate
>  discussion and source groups makes it easier to archive the "important"
>  stuff.  It requires less work for archivers who actually care about the
>  quality of their archives as opposed to the number of megabytes and makes
>  it easier for users of the archives to actually find things. ...

	The above was not a comment about a specific archiver of Coherent/
Minix/Unix/or any other systems software or discussions.  I access many
archives via ftp on a regular basis and they are all appreciated.  If any
maintainer of an archive site was offended by the statements above, please
accept this public apology.  I'll slow down in the future and pay more
attention to what I'm typing...

				Bill Bogstad
				wjb@cogsci.cog.jhu.edu