Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!pacbell.com!tandem!zorch!vsi1!teda!netcom!resnicks From: resnicks@netcom.COM (Steve Resnick) Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: Request for information from OS/2 neophyte Message-ID: <1991Apr24.214625.12397@netcom.COM> Date: 24 Apr 91 21:46:25 GMT References: <1991Apr22.211632.4960@colorado.edu> <1991Apr24.125818.26340@watson.ibm.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services UNIX System {408 241-9760 guest} Lines: 68 In article <1991Apr24.125818.26340@watson.ibm.com> larrys@yktvmv writes: >>1. I'm fairly convinced from what I've read that OS/2 is >> a Good Thing. Where can I buy this software? > >Yes, it is a good thing. Unfortunately, other than an official IBM >dealer, no one else carries OS/2. > >>2. Is the rest of the world (software vendors, in particular) >> as ignorant as my local software stores about OS/2? > >Not really, although there are a lot of misconceptions about OS/2: > (Seen in a trade mag) OS/2 is not a preemptive multitasking > operating system. Windows is. Windows is not preemptive multi-tasking. OS/2 is. > > There are no applications for OS/2. > There are several MS applications and other vendors who support OS/2. > It is more difficult to program for than DOS+Windows. > Are we talking PM or OS/2? PM offers a richer API than Windows, and OS/2 offers a richer API than DOS. 99% of my code which I have written in C for DOS ports directly to OS/2. > etc... > >>3. Is it supported for non-IBM hardware? If not (I've heard >> it isn't), does it run on non-IBM hardware? In particular, >> I've got a fairly generic Klever 386 motherboard and >> Phoenix BIOS. > >I don't think it is supported on non-IBM hardware, but my housemate has >1.3 running on a clone, so it will work, even though you might have to do >some black magic to get it to work. > I don't know about 1.3, but 1.2 ran on my Weitek 386/20 w/ Award 3.11 BIOS out of the box. >>4. Is it true that IBM has lowered the price to $150 for >> the standard 1.3 release? The Wall Street Journal says >> yes, the software store says no. > >The software store is wrong. Tell them your fairy godmother told you so. > >>5. Is it really likely that if I bought it now that it will >> still be supported a year from now? > >Most definately. If past actions are any indication, you will probably >be able to upgrade to 2.0 for free, should you buy 1.3 now. What you've said here almost entirely contradicts my experience with OS/2. - Steve -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- resnicks@netcom.com, steve@camphq, IFNA: 1:143/105.0, USNail: 530 Lawrence Expressway, Suite 374 Sunnyvale, Ca 94086 In real life: Steve Resnick. Chief Software Architect, Process Scientific, Inc Flames, grammar and spelling errors >/dev/null 0x2b |~ 0x2b, THAT is the question. The Asylum OS/2 BBS - (408)263-8017 12/2400,8,1 - Running Maximus CBCS 1.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------