Xref: utzoo comp.os.os2.misc:1126 comp.periphs.scsi:2469
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!uupsi!cci632!ritcsh!ultb!jan1073
From: jan1073@isc.rit.edu (J.A. Nedelka )
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI and OS/2
Message-ID: <1991Apr25.234823.14126@isc.rit.edu>
Date: 25 Apr 91 23:48:23 GMT
References: <8472@umd5.umd.edu> <1991Apr25.033305.10133@netcom.COM>
Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
Lines: 17

In article <1991Apr25.033305.10133@netcom.COM> feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>I strongly recommend forgetting SCSI if you want to run OS/2.
>Think IDE drives instead.
>-- 
    That's funny, I thought that SCSI was probably the best route to go
for mutitasking systems.  My rapidly aging memory doesn't help me much
here, but I seem to recall that the engineering behind SCSI made it more
appropriate for Unix or OS/2.  I'll have to see if I can find where I
read that...



-- 
Jan A. Nedelka            /   "So much for true love!"
The Fourth Doctor         /         ---Ursula, the Sea Witch
Arnold J. Rimmer          /   "I'm not finished..."
jan1073@ultb.isc.rit.edu  /         ---Edward Scissorhands