Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!conrad Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc Subject: Re: OS/2 2.0beta availability -- IBM flame Message-ID: <1991Apr28.022553.5135@comp.vuw.ac.nz> From: Conrad.Bullock@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Conrad Bullock) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1991 02:25:53 GMT Sender: news@comp.vuw.ac.nz (News Admin) References: <935@slammer.UUCP> <12453@dog.ee.lbl.gov> <1991Apr25.045944.25966@cs.uow.edu.au> <1991Apr26.002345.4659@comp.vuw.ac.nz> <1991Apr26.092659.2639@newross.Princeton.EDU> Organization: Computer Science, Victoria University, Wellington, NewZealand Nntp-Posting-Host: downstage.comp.vuw.ac.nz Originator: conrad@downstage.comp.vuw.ac.nz Lines: 71 In article <1991Apr26.092659.2639@newross.Princeton.EDU>, mg@cs.Princeton.EDU (Michael Golan) writes: |> Conrad.Bullock@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Conrad Bullock) writes: |> >The Beta code is available on |> >a special system (not on a toll free number) so that only those |> seriously |> ^^^^^^^^^ |> >interested will get a copy. |> ^^^^^^^^^^ |> Oh great. If this is any clue as to how IBM think OS/2 should look |> like, |> we can expect to have some important, yet obscure feature given only |> at |> page 1539 of the manual, because IBM figured that "only those |> seriously |> interested will read the manual carefully". Calm down. IBM do not want to give EVERYBODY a copy of the beta code. They don't intend to give everyone a free OS. Making it require an effort to get it should restrict the tyre-kickers. |> Obviously, downloading it with a 2400 modem will take 20 hours, which |> is ridicules. I guess IBM thinks that only people who can afford a 9600 |> modem are "serious" (Thanks god, it doesnt have to have an IBM tag on it, |> does it? Getting a true blue 9600 must really make you a serious person. |> Or maybe serious really means a sucker?) The Beta code BBS had 8 lines running HST Dual standard modems. Just shut up and check your facts before you post. The NSC system itself has about 40 lines running a mixture of HST Dual standards, Hayes V32 V42s, IBM 2400's and some other type. |> Again, if this kind of attitude is what's coming with OS/2, god help us. |> But maybe, just maybe, IBM got it right. Mistakes do happen, you know ... What are you on about? Distributing betas at all seems like a pretty good attitude to me. |> Lighten up, IBM (ha!) One way to make sure everyone log into the BBS, |> accept the agreement, etc, is to put 99% of the software on an ftp site, |> and just the missing 1% in a direct BBS dialup! Or, you could put the |> complete |> software encoded with a password, and give the password only to users |> who |> log in, telling them not to redistribute the password. And these |> ideas only |> took 2 minutes to come up with. I am sure even IBM can come up with |> something |> like this (or maybe not?) The Internet is NOT the be-all and end-all of distribution methods. IBM is not really a TCP/IP shop, if you hadn't noticed. The sysops said on the system that they DON'T want 100,000 CS students ftping the stuff. As it was they were flooded with people trying to get it. It now looks like they will be restricting the beta to those who were users of the NSC system before the beta was made available - those who have been supporting OS/2 - reporting problems, and so on. They should probably restrict it to those who own OS/2 1.X. There is an easier way for those in the US to get the beta. Go to your local IBM branch and ask if you can join the 'Early Experience' program for OS/2 2.0. Just lighten up. -- Conrad Bullock | Domain: conrad@comp.vuw.ac.nz Victoria University of Wellington, | or: conrad@cavebbs.gen.nz New Zealand. | Fidonet: 3:771/130 | BBS: The Cave BBS +64 4 643429