Xref: utzoo comp.os.os2.misc:1111 comp.periphs.scsi:2459
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!bywater!scifi!watson!arnor!ibmman!larrys
From: larrys@watson.ibm.com (Larry Salomon, Jr.)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI and OS/2
Message-ID: <1991Apr26.121820.2635@watson.ibm.com>
Date: 26 Apr 91 12:16:43 GMT
Article-I.D.: watson.1991Apr26.121820.2635
References: <1991Apr25.033305.10133@netcom.COM>
Sender: larrys@ibmman.watson.ibm.com
Reply-To: larrys@yktvmv
Organization: IBM Research
Lines: 21
News-Software: NewsKit 1.2 - LaMail
Nntp-Posting-Host: ibmman

In <1991Apr25.033305.10133@netcom.COM>, feustel@netcom.COM (David Feustel) writes:
>
>I strongly recommend forgetting SCSI if you want to run OS/2.
>Think IDE drives instead.

Any particular reason?  We have a model 90 with SCSI drive running 1.3
and used as a LAN server and we have gotten excellent performance from
it (the hard disk is rather small, but I will be receiving 2 Seagate
Wren VII 1G SCSI drives, so I'll be reporting on those when we've had a
chance to play with them for a bit).

Cheers,
Larry Salomon, Jr. (aka 'Q')            LARRYS@YKTVMV.BITNET
OS/2 Applications and Tools             larrys@ibmman.watson.ibm.com
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center         larrys@eng.clemson.edu
Yorktown Heights, NY

Disclaimer:  The statements and/or opinions stated above are strictly my
own and do not reflect the views of my employer.  Additionally, I have a
reputation for being obnoxious, so don't take any personal attacks too
seriously.