Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!unido!rwthinf!marvin.e17.physik.tu-muenchen.de!berg
From: berg@marvin.e17.physik.tu-muenchen.de (Stephen R. van den Berg)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: ANSI C standard library
Message-ID: <4258@rwthinf.UUCP>
Date: 23 Apr 91 12:55:50 GMT
References: <677@taumet.com> <1991Apr20.092845.14164@watdragon.waterloo.edu> <681@taumet.com>
Sender: news@rwthinf.UUCP
Lines: 11

Stephen Clamage writes:
>Can you name any other functions in the standard C library which
>cannot reasonably be written in strictly-conforming C, or does 2%
>(3 out of about 150) constitute a "large fraction"?

How about the declaration of the va_list macros.
--
Sincerely,                 berg@marvin.e17.physik.tu-muenchen.de
           Stephen R. van den Berg.
"I code it in 5 min, optimize it in 90 min, because it's so well optimized:
it runs in only 5 min.  Actually, most of the time I optimize programs."