Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ccwf.cc.utexas.edu!greg From: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release Message-ID: <47889@ut-emx.uucp> Date: 25 Apr 91 16:22:35 GMT Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Reply-To: greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Greg Harp) Organization: The University of Texas at Austin Lines: 28 Originator: greg@sylvester.cc.utexas.edu [RN once again choked, so I have to post instead of following up to this article.] melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes: What don't you like about Objective-C? It contains a lot fewer extensions to C than C++. It more closely resembles Smalltalk. I've heard many people scream about how nasty C++ is. I'm undecided. I use the things that I like, and ignore that I consider to be thorny. You can use C++ on the NeXT if you like. They ship a C++ compiler with the machine. Well, for one thing C++ is standard. I don't use non-standard languages unless I _know_ I'm not going to be porting something. On the NeXT, I can't assure that, even if I'm using DP for something. Using a non- standard language on _any_ Unix box is not a very smart thing to do. Who's to say that you _won't_ port it, re-writing the GUI code for the other platform? Of course, NeXT went and stuck you with Obj-C if you want to use their Interface Builder. It'd be nice if you could select the language like most other interface design packages I've used. Greg -- Greg Harp |"I was there to match my intellect on national TV, | against a plumber and an architect, both with a PhD." greg@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu| -- "I Lost on Jeopardy," Weird Al Yankovic