Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!gblock
From: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu (Gregory R Block)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: NeXT Press Release
Message-ID: <11500@uwm.edu>
Date: 28 Apr 91 19:41:25 GMT
References: <1991Apr28.125746.14051@sugar.hackercorp.com>
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Reply-To: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Lines: 12
Originator: gblock@csd4.csd.uwm.edu

From article <1991Apr28.125746.14051@sugar.hackercorp.com>, by peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva):
> 
> I don't understand your complaint here, anyway. You don't like the fact that
> NeXT stuck you with ObjC for their IB because it's not portable. So? Anything
> that depends on their IB isn't portable in the first place.

That didn't even cross my mind.  Argh.  You're right, and it's not
worth the bandwidth.  Thanks.  :)
-- 
All opinions are my own, and not those of my employer.
Why?  He doesn't know I'm doing this.
								-Wubba