Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!<UNAUTHENTICATED>+
From: Michael.Witbrock@cs.cmu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
Subject: Re: Kickstart 2.0
Message-ID: <oc6_Rca00XNIM44IM6@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 26 Apr 91 22:19:20 GMT
References: <1292@screamer.csee.usf.edu> <gZPR16w164w@graphics.rent.com> <1991Apr22.084438.1975@rulway.LeidenUniv.nl> <47663@ut-emx.uucp>,
	<1991Apr26.121524.510@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>
Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
Lines: 18
In-Reply-To: <1991Apr26.121524.510@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>

> Excerpts from netnews.comp.sys.amiga.applications: 26-Apr-91 Re:
> Kickstart 2.0 John Davis@csc.canterbur (1708)


> Releasing upgrades via ftp doesn't seem to worry Apple, and I wouldn't
> call them 'non-professional' (I've got _much_ better adjectives reserved
> for
> them:-). 


I recently had the misfortune to have to do something on a mac under
6.x.y.z. (try to compile a program using the latest version of think
c)...  Kaboom, kaboom, KABOOM. I'd call apple unprofessional. But that's
not all I'd call them. I want 2.0 as much as the next person, but I'm
not sure I wouldn't rather wait that have my amiga act like mac. But not
too long. 

michael