Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!mmdf From: fhwri%CONNCOLL.BITNET@yalevm.ycc.yale.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications Subject: Re: Desk Top Publishing Message-ID: <52000@nigel.ee.udel.edu> Date: 27 Apr 91 04:55:46 GMT Sender: mmdf@ee.udel.edu Lines: 62 > > Hi. > > I'm looking into buying a DTP package. Price is not a problem. > Which one would you recommend and for what reason(s)? > > Thanks for any info. > > ############################################################################## > jol@sei.cmu.edu "Life not worth dying for // > (412) 268-7602 isn't worth living for". > Software Engineering Institute AMIGA \X/ > There are three major DTP packages available: 1: Professional Page 2.0 is $395 list. It's the upgrade of the first serious DTP package for the Amiga. Advantages: Compugraphic Fonts Import ProDraw clips The Text Editor, which allows you to rapidly edit text Disadvantages: You have to create a box to hold anything Gold Disk's customer support is abysmal Slow at printing The CGCache takes up enormous (>5 meg) amounts of hard drive space 2: Pagestream 2.1 is $295 list Advantages: Compugraphic fonts Proprietary fonts (20 disks or so) Adobe Type 1 fonts to dot matrix (!) The *best* font handling, and the *most* styles Superb structured graphics tools Multiple documents open at once Probably the best manual of the three (MUCH improved over their first manual) Soft-Logik's customer support is excellent Import ProDraw clips etc. Disadvantages: Still locks up on occasion can take a while to display a large font list 3: Saxon Publisher is $*** (can't remember the price) Advantages: Allows nonrectangular columns (a unique feature, but I question how often you'd use it...) Nice tagging functions Disadvantages: Postscript output only at present (I think) No Compugraphic support? I am a Pagestream fan, I must admit. I use a HP Deskjet and the output is first-rate. The printing is speedy and I can use my hard drive to hold FONTS, and not the enormous CGCache that ProPage requires. If I need to edit text rapidly, I can multitask Transwrite with it, select text, output ASCII to RAM:, delete the selected text, edit the text in RAM:, and import ASCII right back. Not as convenient as ProPage, but just as useful. Pagestream also imports more different types of graphics than any other program. Its structured graphics tools are the most intuitive I have seen, and they work very well. Variable zoom, too, and you'll be glad you have it. The big new features in ProPage 2.0 were tagging and rotation of objects, something that Pagestream always has had. --Rick Wrigley fhwri@conncoll.bitnet