Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!ucselx!maxc1553
From: maxc1553@ucselx.sdsu.edu (InnerTangent - human1)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.audio
Subject: Re: NoiseTracker 2.0 or greater!!
Message-ID: <1991Apr26.151814.5851@ucselx.sdsu.edu>
Date: 26 Apr 91 15:18:14 GMT
References: <1991Apr24.181914.6894@ucselx.sdsu.edu> <1991Apr26.114710.18822@cs.umu.se>
Organization: San Diego State University Computing Services
Lines: 22

dvljhg@cs.umu.se (J|rgen Holmberg) writes:

>I don't think the company marketing NT 2.0 would appreciate it being spread in
>that way. How about (gasp!) buying it? I might add that the company marketing
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^[I'll decide what to buy, mind you?]
>this product lost a LOT of money due to a hacker releasing the program a couple
>of weeks before officail release date.

	But.. it's in CompuServe's Amiga section, and also in GEnie's
amiga download areas.  If it is commercial, why is it available on such big
BBS-networks?  Protracker and StarTrekker is BETTER then noisetracker2.0, and
so there is no reason to by NT 2.0 unless I'm a big fan of theirs.  

	What company marketed NT 2.0?  They should be more careful of what
they release.  (Did they wrote the entire code in C or pascal now? Can it
		run at normal speed on NTSC machines in this version?)

-- 
                                                                    [unify]
   *************************************************************************
   *     All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain.   +
   *-----------------------------------------------------------------------+