Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.graphics:1121 comp.sys.amiga.misc:2909
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewse!cbnewsd!rcj2
From: rcj2@cbnewsd.att.com (ray.c.jender)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics,comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: Promises, Promises: ColorBurst=Vapor?
Message-ID: <1991Apr24.171320.2207@cbnewsd.att.com>
Date: 24 Apr 91 17:13:20 GMT
References: <1991Apr24.164515.20482@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 20

In article <1991Apr24.164515.20482@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> njg2@po.CWRU.Edu (J. Norell Guttman) writes:
>
>	It has been months since MAST declared that ColorBurst would be
>released.  Supposedly for the price of DCTV an amiga user could buy colorburst
>and get a 24 bit graphics adapter [card?].  Well, I am sure Amiga users
>around the world are waiting... so could anyone who has some info please
>post!!!!!!  
>

	Well, according to the MAST BBS, it's been delayed again.
	They don't give a reason. Now we all know the last status
	was that it was in FCC. Could it have failed FCC? What does
	that mean if it does fail? If it did'nt fail, I would expect
	it to be hitting the streets soon, but now this delay.
	Was it really in FCC? Or is all the delay due to waiting
	for $$$$ from the European PAL version that was released?
	My initial plans were to purchace something later this year.
	Either DCTV, HAM-E, or ColorBurst, but I'm getting itchy
	and don't know if I can hold off, in which case MAST will
	end up a definate loser....