Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!quest!orbit!zuhause!bruce
From: bruce@zuhause.MN.ORG (Bruce Albrecht)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: WB2.0 question - BRU
Message-ID: <bruce.0391@zuhause.MN.ORG>
Date: 27 Apr 91 02:53:55 GMT
References: <11839@jarthur.Claremont.EDU>
Organization: Society to Stamp Out Bogus Organizations
Lines: 16

In article <11839@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> rolee@jarthur.Claremont.EDU (Profess'nal Agitator) writes:
>How does this utility compare with commercial backup systems?  Are there any
>features of BRU (good or bad) that particularly stand out?  Before I
>acquired my A3000, I was using Quarterback with my A2000.  At this stage of
>the game, I probably will still use QB since I have an extensive library of
>QB'd disks.

There are two things I dislike about BRU.  If you backup to disks, and want to
verify, you have to insert all the disks twice.  The second thing is that when
you insert a BRU disk that is not labeled (yeah, I know I should mark them), 
there's no easy way to tell which disk number of the archive it is.  The disk
number is not in the disk name.
--


bruce@zuhause.mn.org