Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!public!valentin From: valentin@public.BTR.COM (Valentin Pepelea) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: CDTV & CD-I Message-ID: <2600@public.BTR.COM> Date: 28 Apr 91 10:32:18 GMT References: <1991Apr27.233408.208@news.iastate.edu> Organization: BTR Communications, Mtn. View, CA Lines: 37 In article <1991Apr27.233408.208@news.iastate.edu> taak9@isuvax.iastate.edu writes: > >I'm afraid, tho, that the CD-I product will be more successful simply >because of the tremendous amount of capital backing it up. I contest this argument. First of all, the CD-I has been "about to ship in October" for 4 years now. CDTV on the other hand is a real product. It is shipping, and titles are already available for it. Ziltch for CD-I. Secondly, Philips has fallen into financial trouble lately. That will hamper them from promoting the product adequately. Commodore on the other hand is doing better than ever, if your take the stock price as a measure. (Too bad you can't take the stock price as a measure.) Software is easy to port to the CDTV, and the development platform is widely available and mature. Hah! for CD-I. Philips has gone the right way by fetching a real-time multitasking OS for their machine, and perhaps a better one at that, but the market will not consider this a factor. The CD-I has better graphics, yes, but on a television set you can't make the difference. At this point in time, CDTV looks like the sure winner. Only a brilliant marketing campain could propel CD-I beyond the growing success of the CDTV. But Commodore could not possibly be beaten at the marketing game, could it? Valentin (duh) -- "An operating system without virtual memory Name: Valentin Pepelea is an operating system without virtue." Phone: (408) 985-1700 Usenet: mips!btr!valentin - Ancient Inca Proverb Internet: valentin@btr.com