Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!UTCVM.BITNET!MQUINN From: MQUINN@UTCVM.BITNET Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: ML subroutines (passing parameters in ML) Message-ID: <9104250048.AA26870@apple.com> Date: 24 Apr 91 23:37:04 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 15 On Wed, 24 Apr 91 04:24:38 GMT ACMFIU said: > >i'm just looking for efficiency and readability. #1 above is definitely >not readable. but #2 is. does anyone pass parameters via the stack? Yes... That's probably the best way to do it. If you do any toolbox programing on the GS, that's the way you pass parameters to the tools... but when passing to your own routines, be absolutely positive you pull off the same amount you pushed! >albert ---------------------------------------- BITNET-- mquinn@utcvm <------------send files here pro-line-- mquinn@pro-gsplus.cts.com