Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!pacbell.com!ucsd!ucrmath!feller!rhyde
From: rhyde@feller.ucr.edu (randy hyde)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: speed loss
Message-ID: <13976@ucrmath.ucr.edu>
Date: 27 Apr 91 00:13:06 GMT
References: <9104181535.AA28525@apple.com> <1991Apr20.080839.27678@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1991Apr23.170359.19679@nevada.edu> <13842@ucrmath.ucr.edu> <1991Apr24.200233.3702@nntp-server.caltech.edu>
Sender: news@ucrmath.ucr.edu
Reply-To: rhyde@feller.ucr.edu (randy hyde)
Lines: 6

>> Cmon,... no one's going to run a 17 Mhz 65816 off drams...

That's for sure!  I never claimed they would try.  I was just explaining why
losing cycles to refresh is a fact of life on chips faster than the original
1 Mhz 6502 in the Apple II.  Wait states (even with a big cache) are a bigger
problem with 17Mhz 65816 chips than refresh cycles.