Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!apple!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!ysub!psuvm!jbk4
From: JBK4@psuvm.psu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: C64 on an IBM card?
Message-ID: <91114.223452JBK4@psuvm.psu.edu>
Date: 25 Apr 91 02:34:52 GMT
References: <1991Apr17.022048.15067@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU>
 <91109.150907JBK4@psuvm.psu.edu> <1991Apr23.094549.3324@desire.wright.edu>
Organization: Penn State University
Lines: 15

I apologize for offending any of you with the last line of my previous post.  I
 didn't mean it to be a flame against the 64/128s.  I wasn't comparing the 64 t
o an AMIGA or to an IBM or any other new machine.  I meant that if you are buy
ing an IBM or AMIGA or whatever that you should USE IT.  To buy a new machine(I
BM) to run an older machine's(64) software doesn't make much sense unless you'r
e doing it for nostalgia.  As I had said before,  only people who have/had 64s
would be interested in an Emulator.  If you want to run your old 64 stuff then
keep the 64.  Even though I have an Amiga,  I still have my 64 laying around so
that whenever I get the urge to play one of my old favorites I can.  I think th
at the likelyhood of seeing a 64-board for the IBM is nil, the same goes for a
64-board on an Amiga.  But if you want to emulate, Amiga is the only one that
will.
Again, I apologize for any of you that were offended, no flame was intended.

Jason Koszarsky, JBK4@PSUVM