Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!van-bc!ubc-cs!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!bcsaic!hsvaic!scott From: scott@hsvaic.boeing.com (Scott Hinckley) Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds Subject: Re: Repost of Calculator List Message-ID: <257@hsvaic.boeing.com> Date: 26 Apr 91 17:15:57 GMT References: <51906@apple.Apple.COM> <2815e048:2895.1comp.sys.handhelds;1@hpcvbbs.UUCP> <41637@cup.portal.com> Reply-To: scott@hsvaic.boeing.com Organization: I try not to Lines: 32 In <41637@cup.portal.com> jpser@cup.portal.com (John Paul Serafin) writes: >akcs.kevin@hpcvbbs.UUCP (Kevin Jessup) writes: >>I must agree with your statement that the first series >>had "the best quality ever"! I'd love to see them built >>like that gain! >But would you buy them? Specifically, would you pay the much higher >cost given the choice of the two units side by side? >What about all the whiners who don't remember or never knew the joy >of being able to replace a mechanical slide rule with an electronic >one for a mere 395 1972 dollars who complain about the exorbitant >249 1990's dollars for a machine that couldn't be had for any price >10 years ago and which will probably take heavy use for long after >it is obsolete. I can remember when (my father) brought home his first ($400) HP calculator. It was state of the art, it did X/+- and had one memory (any other features I don't recall). It only weighed about a pound, and the transformer about 2. Bright (easy to read) LED numbers. SEVERAL places of accuracy. Yeah, those were the good ol days. Why, today for $250 I can only get a calculator that does more than most computers I have ever owned in terms of equation handling. -- <<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>VW&Apple][Forever!!!>>>>>>>>>> Internet:scott@hsvaic.boeing.com|UUCP:...!uunet!uw-beaver!bcsaic!hsvaic!scott DISCLAIMER: All contained herein are my opinions, they do not|+1 205 461 2073 represent the opinions or feelings of Boeing or its management| BTN:461-2073