Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:8153 comp.sys.mac.misc:11447
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!gatech!prism!mailer.cc.fsu.edu!uflorida!reef.cis.ufl.edu!jdb
From: jdb@reef.cis.ufl.edu (Brian K. W. Hook)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Good mice
Keywords: Reliability, Accuracy, Feel
Message-ID: <28236@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>
Date: 27 Apr 91 21:43:23 GMT
References: <1991Apr25.233036.11353@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> <1991Apr26.165111.1634@cbnewsj.att.com> <1991Apr26.222940.29322@amd.com>
Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU
Distribution: na
Organization: UF CIS Dept.
Lines: 17

In article <1991Apr26.222940.29322@amd.com> phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes:
|>The only mouse worth getting is the microsoft mouse.
|>It is perfectly compatible, both by definition, and in
|>practice, unlike the logidreck. It is the best feeling
|>and best tracking mouse in the world. I only wish I
|>could get one for my stupid Mac. And my stupid Apollo.

I will agree that the new MS Mouse is very nice, but you overgeneralized.
first of all, Logitech puts on some DAMNED nice mice.  That new wireless is
awesome.  The ergonomic mice are REAL nice to use, and the third button is
occasionally useful.

And MS mice are NOT always compatible.  There have been several times when
they screwed up their drivers with new mice and old programs wouldn't work
anymore.

Brian