Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!linus!linus!news
From: Norman_Bram@qmgate.mitre.org
Subject: ATI 1024 and non-interlaced monitors
Message-ID: <1991Apr22.122939.24045@linus.mitre.org>
Sender: news@linus.mitre.org (News Service)
Nntp-Posting-Host: bramn.mitre.org
Organization: MITRE Corporation
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1991 12:29:39 GMT

I have an ATI 1024 Board (OEM variety purchased in early1990) with 512K memory.
 Does that board support non-interlaced 1024x768 monitors. Their setup program
lists the NEC 4 and 5 on its menu, but does not explicitly discuss the subject
of non-interlaced support at all. The next question is as follows: Assuming
non-interlaced support- do I select the NEC 4 on its  setup menu.  If anyone
has actually used a similiar combination please let me know.

Also, everyone has been discussing the merits of the Sony 1304 interlaced
monitor. A local superstore, CompuAdd sells the Seiko CM-1450. I would
appreciate it if anyone has had any good/bad experiences with that board while
using it with Windows 3.0 in an interlaced mode.