Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mixcom!llvvll From: llvvll@mixcom.COM (James R. Macak) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: What are the possible memory configurations of an SE/30? Summary: More SE/30 SIMM details wanted Message-ID: <625@mixcom.COM> Date: 24 Apr 91 02:08:34 GMT References: <1991Apr23.155150.7671@cec1.wustl.edu> <1991Apr23.181407.23784@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Distribution: na Organization: MIX Communications, Milwaukee, WI (Worldwide Email, Usenet BBS) Lines: 40 In article <1991Apr23.181407.23784@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> gaynor@magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu (Jim Gaynor) writes: >In article <1991Apr23.155150.7671@cec1.wustl.edu> bst2948@cec2.wustl.edu (Bryan Sauhsung Tung) writes: >> (several lines deleted) > (several lines deleted) >The SE/30 has 2 bank of 4 slots each. Each bank must be filled with >SIMMs of the same size, and the really ought to be of the same speed >as well. The SE/30 requires a minimum memory speed of 120ns, which >isn't difficult - most SIMM suppliers sell SIMMs that run at 70-80ns. I've read this before about the SIMMs needing to be the same "speed" within a bank, but never really understood the reason for this. Can someone post an explanation (avoiding extreme techo-babble)? How much tolerance might be acceptable relative to the speed difference? I have some 70ns SIMMs... need I find some more 70ns or will 80ns do? >Thus, with 256k SIMMs, 1MB SIMMs, and 4MB SIMMs, you have the >following possible combos: >Total RAM Bank "A" Bank "B" >--------- -------- -------- >1 MB 4 256k SIMMs -empty- >2 MB 4 256k SIMMs 4 256k SIMMs >4 MB 4 1MB SIMMs -empty- >5 MB 4 1MB SIMMs 4 256k SIMMs >8 MB 4 1MB SIMMs 4 1MB SIMMs >16 MB * 4 4MB SIMMs -empty- In the 5 meg configuration, does it matter if the 1 MB SIMMs are in bank "A" or "B?" Might there be a speed degradation if the 256 K SIMMs were in one bank or the other? I thought I had read something about this once upon a time... (Note this is for a "straight" SE/30 without any card in its slot.) Thanks. Jim -- macak@mixcom.UUCP (James R. Macak) "I'm curious, Doctor, why is it uunet!uwm!mixcom!macak called 'M-5' and not 'M-1'?" << All my own opinions. >>