Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!pacbell.com!ucsd!sdcc6!sdcc13!jclee
From: jclee@sdcc13.ucsd.edu (Jimmy Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
Subject: Comparing Mac + and SE
Message-ID: <18765@sdcc6.ucsd.edu>
Date: 28 Apr 91 03:09:49 GMT
Sender: news@sdcc6.ucsd.edu
Lines: 43

The results I had obtained was done without any inits installed,
AppleTalk was disabled, and no ram cache.  
The thing that surprise me was that the results differs depending
upon which Apple HD was installed.  For example, the Miniscribe was
a little bit faster than the Rodime.  The overall speed was 1.14 and
1.02 respectively.  

I had also tested out the new Mac Classic and found the following
results:
           Classic with 2 megs and Conner 40 meg HD
             CPU 1.0            Math 1.0
           Disk  2.14         Overall 1.20

           Classic with 1 meg and Rodime 100 meg HD
            CPU 1.0             Math 1.0
           Disk 2.86        Overall  1.38

With my somewhat limited technical experience, I say that the Mac +
and the SE is very identical.  The results I got was rather similar.
                                               
If I do a lot of application switching and opening and closing
windows, the Plus seems to does it more smoothly and a little
faster.  While, on the other hand, the SE slows to almost a crawl if
I do the same.  The Classic was a lot better.  

The truth:  I am convinced that SE has its advantages.  For example,
it does the "writing" part a bit faster when duplicating a big file,
it scrolls a bit more smoothly and faster in the "Page View" mood of
Word 4.0, and does QuickDraw faster, according to experts on this
net.    

What are QuickDraw applications? Also could I have some response
what I have just typed?

Thanks.  Pleas excuse my grammatical errors. 
:wq
:
wq
:pp
Help I can't send it!!
:wp

             CPU