Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!jessica.stanford.edu!bard From: bard@jessica.stanford.edu (David Hopper) Subject: Re: Amiga Video Toaster for the MAC Message-ID: <1991Apr25.021201.3168@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News) Organization: Academic Information Resources, Stanford University References: <1991Apr20.021658.22070@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <5967@pbhyb.PacBell.COM> <1991Apr23.031929.16324@cs.dal.ca> <1195@mdavcr.UUCP> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 91 02:12:01 GMT Lines: 51 In article <1195@mdavcr.UUCP> ewm@mdavcr.UUCP (Eric W. Mitchell) writes: >In article <1991Apr23.031929.16324@cs.dal.ca> graham@ug.cs.dal.ca (Michael Graham) writes: >> Luckily I'm a Mac owner. An Amiga owner would laugh his head off at this >>idea. Do you have any idea of what the toaster can do? If not try and catch >>Tod Rundgren's latest video. It *easily* rivals what I have seen from Pixar >>and SGI. It could easily do the Lifesaver ad. >>mike > >I think you may have the facts a little messed up here. The Video Toaster >is a video production device, not a renderer. It is designed to give you >near commercial quality transition effects and some limited graphics (titling, >etc). Not quite. The toaster, both the $1600 Amiga version and the proposed $4000 Mac version, includes A) Transition effects master program B) Character generator C) Lightwave, the 3-D Modeler/Renderer/Animator (truly *amazing*) D) ToasterPaint, a 24-bit paint program (much like Digi-Paint 3.0, if you've ever seen it) E) ChromaFX, a color tweaker/special effects program Lightwave is not a true renderer, granted (it uses Phong shading to achieve shadowed effects), but the output is terrific, and it is *fast*. The animation capabilities and output is quite up to par with what Pixar has been putting out. Indeed, check out Todd Rundgren's video. It was done *entirely* with the Video Toaster, from start to finish. >In the version of the toaster I have seen (which was demonstrated to our >company), there were no significant rendering functions. This means >you cannot create anything even resembling the "lifesaver commercial" with >the toaster - it is intended for an entirely different purpose. > >The toaster could be used to take existing video of the lifesavers and >combine segments in interesting ways, but could not produce the graphics >themselves. To compare it to Pixar or SGI products is like comparing >Apples and screwdrivers. Lightwave is actually the most interesting part of the package. I cannot understand why it was not demonstrated to you, as it is an integral part of the Toaster. >Eric Mitchell | "We're Screwed!!!" Peace, Dave Hopper | /// Anthro Creep | Academic Info Resources, Stanford |__ /// . . | Macincrap/UNIX Consultant bard@jessica. |\\\/// Ia! Ia! | -- Just remember: love is life, and Stanford.EDU | \XX/ Shub-Niggurath! | hate is living death. :Black Sabbath