Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!duteca!thomas From: thomas@duteca (Thomas Okken) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system Subject: Apple should offer 32-bit clean ROM upgrades! Message-ID: <1291@duteca.UUCP> Date: 24 Apr 91 01:17:41 GMT Reply-To: thomas@duteca.et.tudelft.nl (Thomas Okken) Organization: Delft University of Technology, Netherlands Lines: 37 With the System 7.0 coming any time now, it will become increasingly clear that owners of the older Mac II models (II, IIx, IIcx and SE/30) are about to be left in the cold where the full power of this System is concerned. What is the problem? These older Macs do not have 32-bit clean ROMs, and because of this, you cannot use 32-bit addressing. This leaves us with a silly 16 MB addressing limit. Because of this, no matter how much RAM I plug into my machine, MultiFinder and applications can never use more that 16 megabytes. (Actually, it is even less, because the ROM and NuBus cards also take up address space; I can get up to 14 meg using Virtual.) Later Mac II models have 32-bit clean ROMs; on those machines the limit to usable memory is so dizzyingly high that the concept of "Out of Memory" errors may well disappear: the only reason for adding RAM to a machine with gigabytes of virtual memory is to increase performance. As new (and ever more badly-written) software starts using this capability, we with our original Mac II's will be left behind. And before you say "so are Plus/SE/Classic users", remember that those machines were designed with this limitation, whereas the 32-bit dirtiness of the Mac II ROMs is really just a *bug*. With buggy software, we expect fixes and cheap/free updates, so why should it be any different with the software in ROM? It would pain me a lot, apart from souring me on the Mac experience, if Apple decides to let all Mac II users underuse the perfectly good hardware in their machines because of a bug in the ROMs. Most of you will agree with me that the current policy is unsatisfactory, to say the least: to get a 32-bit clean machine, II/IIx owners can get a IIfx upgrade, IIcx owners can upgrade to a IIci, and SE/30 owners are out in the cold. Apple, are you listening? Please offer a 32-bit clean ROM for the old Mac IIs, I wouldn't mind paying a few bucks to get it! Let's keep these machines in commission just a bit longer - not everyone *needs* a IIfx! If you agree with me, let the world know! If Apple becomes aware that a large number of Mac II users want such an upgrade, it might motivate them to get it out the door. - Thomas (thomas@duteca.et.tudelft.nl)