Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!caen!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!pequod.cso.uiuc.edu!dorner
From: dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Another reason for NEEDING 32bit ROMs....
Message-ID: <1991Apr26.132711.22029@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 26 Apr 91 13:27:11 GMT
References: <232@hermix.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois at U-C
Lines: 17

In article <232@hermix.UUCP> lance@hermix.UUCP (Lance Ellinghouse) writes:
>	WE CANNOT STATE OUR PRODUCTS ARE 32BIT CLEAN UNLESS WE TRY THEM!!!!
>*** WHAT ARE WE SUSPOSED TO DO??????? ***

Buy a IIfx, of course; what could be better for Apple than that?

What?  You can't _afford_ a IIfx?  Your product must not be any good, then.
Remember, the quality of a product is directly proportional to the depth
of the pockets of its developer.  :-)

[To be fair, I think Apple is starting to move away from that philosophy;
the new 'low-end' developer bundles are one sign of that.  Goes along
with the move toward the low-end buyer.]

--
Steve Dorner, U of Illinois Computing Services Office
Internet: s-dorner@uiuc.edu  UUCP: uunet!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!s-dorner