Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewse!cafe
From: cafe@cbnewse.att.com (richard.dib)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: split up comp.sys.next (PLEASE!!)
Message-ID: <1991Apr27.054130.1273@cbnewse.att.com>
Date: 27 Apr 91 05:41:30 GMT
References: <14461@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> <1438@radius.com> <1991Apr26.130542.29235@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 16

In article <1991Apr26.130542.29235@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>, smb3u@psysun1.acc.Virginia.EDU (Steven M. Boker) writes:
> I suggest that the following split would bring volume down to managable
> levels.
> 
> comp.sys.next.discussions-about-splitting-the-group
> comp.sys.next.impact-advertising-and-followups
> comp.sys.next
> 
> Seriously.
> 
> Steve

I agree 100%
;-)

Richard