Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!kithrup!sef
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: Shared libraries
Message-ID: <1991Apr25.175547.21534@kithrup.COM>
Date: 25 Apr 91 17:55:47 GMT
References: <112@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> <716@seqp4.UUCP> <136@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Lines: 25

In article <136@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) writes:
>As shown <112@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> in comp.unix.wizards, total size of
>binaries excluding X11 is comparable to its machines real memory size.
>This means, real memory consumption is negligible unless we want to
>execute all binaries at once.

What mean we, white man?

The sum total size of all the binaries I regularly use (on kithrup, of
course) is about four or five times the size of kithrup's real memory
(kithrup has 8Mbytes these days).

Back before I got that additional 4Mbytes, the only reason kithrup was able
to run decently was because all or most of the system binaries were built
using shared libraries (uucp being the major exception, and the major cause
for system slowness as a result).

Not everyone has a system in which 8Mbytes is considered a small cache, you
know.

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "I made the universe, but please don't blame me for it;
sef@kithrup.COM  |  I had a bellyache at the time."
-----------------+           -- The Turtle (Stephen King, _It_)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.