Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!samsung!emory!mnopltd!neal
From: neal@mnopltd.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Since Most Everythings's right with SCO Can we make it smaller?
Message-ID: <204@mnopltd.UUCP>
Date: 24 Apr 91 04:30:32 GMT
Reply-To: gatech!stiatl!mnopltd!neal
Organization: MNOP Ltd., Atlanta, Ga.
Lines: 19

The current (maybe hopefully past) ankle-biting parade over SCO is of no
interest to me.   SCO is as great as the world deserves.  Now, on to 
business.

I noticed that the Xenix 2.3.2 kernel is about 1000K.   The SCO Unix
kernel is about 2000K.   All worthwhile, no doubt.   However, one of the
new machines I just brought up is about 1000k short of memory and is 
paging under heavy load.  (> 18 users)

Are there any things I can safely reconfigure out which will get me 
down to the size of Xenix?   I was hoping in terms of features we don't
use like RFS, NFS, TCP, etc. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neal Rhodes                       MNOP Ltd                     (404)- 972-5430
President                Lilburn (atlanta) GA 30247             Fax:  978-4741
                             emory!mnopltd!neal 
                         gatech!emory!mnopltd!neal 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------