Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!jahangir!marc
From: marc@jahangir.UUCP (Marc Rossner)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Since Most Everythings's right with SCO Can we make it smaller?
Message-ID: <545@jahangir.UUCP>
Date: 24 Apr 91 15:35:56 GMT
References: <204@mnopltd.UUCP>
Organization: Springfield (I swear)
Lines: 14

In article <204@mnopltd.UUCP>, neal@mnopltd.UUCP writes:
> The current (maybe hopefully past) ankle-biting parade over SCO is of no
> interest to me.   SCO is as great as the world deserves.  Now, on to 
> business.
> 
> I noticed that the Xenix 2.3.2 kernel is about 1000K.   The SCO Unix
> kernel is about 2000K.   

I thought that the advantage of Xenix was that it was supposed to be tiny.
I also thought that I had a rather massive kernel on my ISC 2.2.  My
kernel is 750K.  Are you sure you have your numbers right?

Marc Rossner
jahangir!marc@uunet.uu.net