Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: wanted: UNIX or clone
Message-ID: <1991Apr25.143615.12473@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 25 Apr 91 14:36:15 GMT
References: <1991Apr16.173457.14365@nstar.rn.com> <1991Apr16.225637.463@unixland.uucp> <9104182040.41@rmkhome.UUCP> <1991Apr21.222710.410@unixland.uucp>
Organization: NSTAR, Indiana's LARGEST BBS 219-289-0287/317-251-7391
Lines: 17

bill@unixland.uucp (Bill Heiser) writes:

>>kernel is available at that point, I will probably go for it.  Otherwise, I
>>would probably use ISC, since I have had a fair amount of experience with
>>their package.

>Rick -- Considering the similarities between ISC and ESIX -- would you
>really spend the extra money for ISC?  This is a home system, right?

ISC and their FFS is so much faster than ESIX - and so many off the
shelf UNIX applications are available for ISC (Word Perfect and Norton
for example).. 

-- 
   Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287 (HST/PEP/V.32/v.42bis)
                        regional UUCP mapping coordinator 
               {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}