Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!fang!tarpit!bilver!bill
From: bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: Since Most Everythings's right with SCO Can we make it smaller?
Message-ID: <1991Apr25.153709.552@bilver.uucp>
Date: 25 Apr 91 15:37:09 GMT
References: <204@mnopltd.UUCP> <545@jahangir.UUCP>
Organization: W. J. Vermillion - Winter Park, FL
Lines: 16

In article <545@jahangir.UUCP> marc@jahangir.UUCP (Marc Rossner) writes:
>In article <204@mnopltd.UUCP>, neal@mnopltd.UUCP writes:
   
>> I noticed that the Xenix 2.3.2 kernel is about 1000K.   The SCO Unix
>> kernel is about 2000K.                                      ^^^^^^^^ 
 
>I thought that the advantage of Xenix was that it was supposed to be tiny.
                                 ^^^^^

SCO manufactures BOTH Xenix and Unix.   Xenix is small in comparison to
Unix.


-- 
Bill Vermillion - UUCP: uunet!tarpit!bilver!bill
                      : bill@bilver.UUCP