Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!brunix!porter!demillo From: demillo@porter.geo.brown.edu (Rob DeMillo) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer Subject: Re: TP IDE and BC++ IDE Message-ID: <73404@brunix.UUCP> Date: 24 Apr 91 21:33:28 GMT References: <1991Apr8.114055.26550@qut.edu.au> <6445@bwdls58.bnr.ca> Sender: news@brunix.UUCP Organization: Brown University - Planetary Geology Group Lines: 36 In article <6445@bwdls58.bnr.ca> mlord@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Mark Lord) writes: >In article <1991Apr8.114055.26550@qut.edu.au> drift@qut.edu.au (Glenn Wallace) writes: > >BC++ can run in windows, like most other DOS programs. It comes with a >protected mode version (BCX) as well as a "regular" version (BC). The linker >and assembler also have protected mode versions included. A much more rounded >package than TP. I'm quickly coming to the conclusion that BC++ for Windows is a crock. It a great C++ compiler, but as a windows application builder, its pretty useless. Calling it a much more rounded package...I dunno. Keep in mind that none of my complaints would be valid if Borland didn't (a) tout BC++ as a windows applications builder, and (b) pull a Microsoftian move like raising the price a few hundred percent. If you have tried to do windows programming with it, you'll know what I mean...the compile cycle is slow, flipping back and forth between DOS full screen mode and Windows to use their IDE is obnoxious..the only thing that I really liked about it is the resource construction kit...and *they* didn't even write it. I dunno...save your money. Anyone know about Zortec C++ combined with C++ Views? - Rob DeMillo | Internet: demillo@juliet.ll.mit.edu Mass Inst of Tech/Lincoln Lab | Also: demillo@porter.geo.brown.edu Weather Sensing Project-Group 43 | Reality: 401-273-0804 (home) "I say you *are* the Messiah, Lord! And I ought to know, I've followed a few!"