Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dali.cs.montana.edu!milton!gibdo!slh
From: slh@gibdo.engr.washington.edu
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms.programmer
Subject: Re: Any DDE experience out there?
Message-ID: <1991Apr28.032344.17921@gibdo.engr.washington.edu>
Date: 28 Apr 91 03:30:40 GMT
References: <POSTNEWS14070@hutch.rabbit.com> <1991Apr16.075505.19995@aie.uucp>
Sender: news@milton.u.washington.edu (News)
Reply-To: slh@gibdo.engr.washington.edu (PUT YOUR NAME HERE)
Organization: zippity
Lines: 15

In article <1991Apr16.075505.19995@aie.uucp> corne@aie.uucp (Corne Brouwers) writes:
>	The sample programs and documentation included in the MS-SDK are
>actually quite good. If you are going to program your applications using the
>MS-SDK I think you won't meet too many problems.
>
	Yeah right.
	The dde code looked pretty tangled and
	at one point they have code commented
	(what you are suppose to do) without any explanation as to why
	it was marked out.
	It also produces errors that show up under the debug version of windows
	The printed examples contain atleast some contradictions and
	wrong/mispelled identfiers.
	They might not be the worst thing in the world,
	but I wouldn't call them quite good.