Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!yale!bunker!hcap!hnews!109!432!Diana.Dawne
From: Diana.Dawne@f432.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Diana Dawne)
Newsgroups: misc.handicap
Subject: Re: artic 3.03
Message-ID: <18984@bunker.isc-br.com>
Date: 24 Apr 91 20:58:40 GMT
Sender: wtm@bunker.isc-br.com
Reply-To: Diana.Dawne@f432.n109.z1.fidonet.org
Organization: FidoNet node 1:109/432 - The Idea Link, Wheaton MD
Lines: 25
Approved: wtm@bunker.hcap.fidonet.org

Index Number: 15160

[This is from the Blink Talk Conference]

It seems there are a number of things that Artic didn't check out and
why on earth they released that software when it really wasn't ready is
something I don't understand.  I have been told that the new software
will be out in may.  That's nice, but the trouble is I doubt Artic
tested it much better then they have what they already have out there.
I find it troubling that Artic seems to seek out really unqualified
people to get opinions from.  Have you contacted them to let them know
about this problem?  Well, if you haven't, I am not so sure that it will
do much good.  They just are not very responsive to the consumer.  I
thought what consumers think is important, but there goes Artic not
caring, and making money doing it.  The question I have is how long do
you think they can continue to keep doing this?   There are a lot of
good programs out there so while they may have been the main one for a
while, things are changing.  It is too bad that when we cannot be helped
by them, we can't get our money back so we can get something that will
work.
 * EZ 1.30 *

--
Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!109!432!Diana.Dawne
Internet: Diana.Dawne@f432.n109.z1.fidonet.org