Xref: utzoo rec.radio.amateur.misc:2107 sci.electronics:19688 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!wang!harvee!esj From: esj@harvee.UUCP (Eric S Johansson) Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc,sci.electronics Subject: Re: How to measure/detect X-ray (cheap)? Message-ID: <4212786@harvee.UUCP> Date: 26 Apr 91 21:49:40 GMT References: <1991Apr23.172122.13076@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE> <4902@kitty.UUCP> Organization: gators 'r us Lines: 30 X-Version: Rodney's UUCP modules 05/09/90 V1.15 In article <4902@kitty.UUCP> larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes: > My best suggestion, if you are really concerned, is to obtain a > photographic film badge dosimeter, fasten it to the outside of the device > in question, run the device for several hours, and then have the film > badge developed and evaluated with a densitometer. There are outside > service organizations who will provide such a service, but you will probably > not like the cost. The best approach would be to find a friend who works > for a hospital radiology or nuclear medicine department and has some "pull" > to do a little favor... :-) > I would not trust film badge dosimeters. My wife works for a vet and they use film badge dosimeters in their x-ray room. One of her co-workers decieded to "test" the dosimeter by giving it a full dose of x-rays i.e the badge was the x-ray target. The report on the badge gave no indication that the badge had been exposed. Now, I don't know what the detection threshold is or if the badge readers can tell the difference between types of exposure but I don't have much faith in dosimeters anymore. ( honey, the light is keeping me awake. please put your head under ther covers... :-) --- eric -- ... ^^^ eric johansson UUCP ...!uunet!wang!harvee!esj esj@harvee.uucp * * a juggling fool AT&T (617) 577-4068 (w) o HAM ka1eec \_/ CSNET johansson%hydra@polaroid.com or hydra!johansson@polaroid.com source of the public's fear of the unknown since 1956