Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!amdcad!military From: zonker@ihlpf.att.com (Thomas M Harris) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: 82nd Airborne nomenclature Message-ID: <1991Apr24.054520.18682@amd.com> Date: 23 Apr 91 16:43:23 GMT References: <1991Apr23.053523.23050@amd.com> Sender: military@amd.com Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 40 Approved: military@amd.com From: zonker@ihlpf.att.com (Thomas M Harris) >From: robinro@ism.isc.com (Robin Roberts) >I will leave the description of the difference between regiments and brigades >to someone with more courage than I. I will take a stab at it. In the U. S. Army the difference is one of purpose. Regiments are standing organizations, all of the same arm of service (e.g. infantry, armor, artillery) and with all battalions equipped similarly. Training, administration and supply(ordering) are usually organized by Regiment. In the field the regimental organization is mostly non-functional, but on base it should be running things. Brigades on the other hand are the field HQs of the division. Brigades are supposed to be Ad-Hoc organizations tailored to the situation. With the idea being that that you can plug in any battalion from the division into any brigade (I believe a single Brigade HQ is supposed to be able to handle about 5 battalions). In practice, the brigade OBs tend to be fairly static at about 1/3 a division. A brigade usually differs in organization from a regiment in that it is composed of multiple arms of service. The brigade vs regiment distinction is most clearly seen in the Armored/Mech divisions where extensive cross attaching is done to make combined arms teams. In an airborne division where the majority of sub-battalions are essentially identical the distinction is less obvious. In an infantry based division with 3 brigades and three infantry regiments there is little prupose in exchanging a battalion from one regiment with that of another. In an armored division where there are two tank regiments and a mech infantry regiment making three brigades each with two tank battalions and a mech infantry battalion makes perfect sense, but regimental cohesiveness is now meaningless (for all three regiments). Non Cuniculus Est, Tom Harris [Paragraph breaks added. --CDR]