Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!nstar!larry From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: T1000 Message-ID: <1991May02.133954.2658@nstar.rn.com> Date: 2 May 91 13:39:54 GMT References: <1991Apr27.233044.22434@nstar.rn.com> <1991May01.021126.1382@nstar.rn.com> <37@mich-ns.Michigan.COM> Organization: NSTAR, Indiana's LARGEST BBS 219-289-0287/317-251-7391 Lines: 29 tech@mich-ns.Michigan.COM (Mich. Network Sys. TECH SUPPORT) writes: >"Of course the T2000 runs around 1420 cps -- my understanding the T1000 will >"do around 850 at best - in which case a v.32bis is a much better selection. >" >You mean the T2500, don't you? (The T2000 is no longer made. Its an SDLC >modem). RE: Speeds: All depends on the phone line quality. Remember, PEP >has the ability to dynamically upshift/downshift. So does V.32bis. we have T2000 and Telebit Trailblazers here - which are about the same (except SDLC is an option for the T2000). >"we are now feeding several sites via both v.32 and v.32bis without problems - >"all of which are long distance... Maybe you are using poor quality v.32 >"modems? With the US Robotics v.32bis modems - we haven't a problem... >There were some problems with echo-cancellation and V.32. Problem is >the quality of your V.32 implimentation. v.32bis modems can be had for around $600 - and look for the prices to come down within the next couple of months. Anyone looking into v.32 should wait and get 50% greater throughput with v.32bis (if they can wait) -- Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287/317-251-7391 HST/PEP/V.32/v.32bis/v.42bis regional UUCP mapping coordinator {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}