Path: utzoo!telecom-request Date: Tue, 30 Apr 91 10:43 PDT From: John Higdon Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Bay Area Cellular Reply-To: John Higdon Message-ID: Organization: Green Hills and Cows Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 321, Message 4 of 4 Lines: 71 On Apr 30 at 5:23, Steve Forrette writes: > There were several smaller reasons for switching, [from GTE to > Cellular One] such as the inability > of customer (dis)service to deal with technical problems (they said "call > the people at the switch directly, using this number", which was never > answered). But now it is the other way around. I recently had an unusual problem at an area known to be good for reception. I got right through to GTE repair service, they took the report and called me back at home twice in the coming days to follow up. I also got an internal number for reporting any other reception problems. At the time I turned off my last Cellular One account, people who took reception reports always told me to have my radio checked because "since Cellular One's system is so superior," the problem had to be with my equipment. > But my main problem was with roaming. The only trouble I have ever had with roaming (the *18 "follow me roaming" seems to work just fine) was when I was on Cellular One. About half the carriers in California refused to give me roaming privleges unless I coughed up with a credit card. I understand that that has changed, but an associate with CellOne still complains that he has trouble roaming on "A" carriers in other states. I have never had problems with the "B" carriers. > Plus, you get all your custom calling features as well, something Follow Me > Raoming didn't offer. I heard talk that the B systems in California were > working on something like this, and maybe it's working now, but that's a > couple of years later. It is. And it does not matter who is first, it is the present that counts. > For one thing, Cellular One had coverage through the > Caldecot Tunnel, since 1987 (GTE got it in 1990). When I first saw this > advertised, I thought it was pretty much a gimmick, but I've been surprised > just how many times it's come in handy. John's San Jose home is about an > hour away from the tunnel, so his priorities are probably different. And did they advertise it. Every single commercial trumpeted coverage through the Caldecot Tunnel, as if nothing else mattered. Of course, this major technological feat is accomplished by locating a cell site at one end. Of course, Steve is correct: my home is an hour away from this magic spot, and besides when I travel up there I can go directly to the destination at either end without going through the tunnel (just like I can go to either Oakland or San Francisco without using a bridge). The problem at the time was that Cellular One did not have acceptable coverage in my driveway! I was very happy that Cellular One had conquered the Caldecot Tunnel, but it was most disconcerting to lose calls as I was reaching my home. I live in the Willow Glen district of San Jose -- hardly a fringe or out of the way place! > I'm sure John has similar stories with the carriers reversed. Maybe we're > both right, and it's just that each carrier has concentrated on a different > end of the bay. I'm looking forward to hearing of his CellOne horror > stories! No real horror stories; I just did not feel that Cellular One (despite the aggressive advertising) was really providing me with the service I was paying for. I had bad luck with roaming, coverage, and customer service. But the voice mail is a little cheaper! John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395 john@zygot.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !